Vision · Language · Action

MOSAIC: Modular Obstacle and Spatial-Aware Framework for Manipulation In Cluttered Scenes

1 Huawei Noah’s Ark Lab2 University of Toronto3 Simon Fraser University

* Equal contribution † Project lead and corresponding author

Code and dataset will be released upon acceptance.

The idea

Explicit scene understanding. Grounded actions.

Know what to move.
Understand what’s in the way.

MOSAIC gives pretrained VLA policies explicit cues about the target, destination, and surrounding obstacles, helping guide manipulation in cluttered scenes.

MOSAIC overview: image and language inputs produce target, destination, and obstacle masks. Object depth and learned obstacle attention are injected into the action expert to guide manipulation.
MOSAIC at a glance. Semantic masks, object depth, and obstacle-aware attention connect scene understanding to action generation.View figure PDF ↗
Target objectDestination regionSurrounding obstacles

Research summary

Abstract

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong performance in robotic manipulation, yet most rely primarily on 2D visual observations and language instructions, leaving scene geometry and obstacle relationships to be inferred implicitly. This limitation is particularly problematic in cluttered environments, where small spatial errors can lead to unintended contacts or collisions.

We propose MOSAIC, a modular spatial- and obstacle-aware framework that can be integrated with pretrained VLA policies to improve object-level scene understanding and action generation. Our method augments the VLA backbone with an auxiliary semantic grounding task that predicts role-specific masks for the target object, destination region, and surrounding obstacles. We further combine the target and destination masks with depth estimated from 3D scene reconstruction to construct role-specific geometric tokens that are injected directly into the action expert.

In addition, we propose obstacle-aware attention supervision that emphasizes obstacles near the robot body during task execution. The resulting attention features are subsequently injected into later action-expert layers to further guide action generation. Together, these components provide explicit semantic, geometric, and obstacle-aware cues while preserving the underlying pretrained VLA architecture.

We evaluate our framework on pretrained VLA model using the RoboPRO benchmark, including visual perturbation tests, and further validate it on real-world manipulation tasks. MOSAIC improves the success rate by 5.1% in cluttered scenes, and by 9.7% under visual perturbations, with gains of up to 25.0% in the most challenging environment. We will release our code and dataset upon acceptance.

Inside MOSAIC

Three cues. One modular framework.

Add semantic, geometric, and obstacle-aware information while preserving the underlying pretrained VLA architecture.

01 / Semantics

Ground the scene

An auxiliary semantic grounding task predicts role-specific masks for the target object, destination region, and obstacles.

02 / Geometry

Bring depth into action

Target and destination masks select reconstructed scene depth, creating role-specific geometric tokens for the action expert.

03 / Attention

Account for obstacles

Training supervision emphasizes obstacles near the robot body. Learned attention features are injected into later action-expert layers.

Detailed MOSAIC architecture showing multi-view semantic grounding, object depth extraction, geometry token fusion, training-only obstacle attention supervision, and attention injection into late action layers.
The complete architecture. From multi-view observations and role-conditioned masks to geometry fusion, attention supervision, and action execution.View figure PDF ↗

MOSAIC in motion

From scene understanding to action.

Real-world execution, benchmark comparisons, and a closer look at what the policy attends to.

Real-world manipulation. Placing a cup on a coaster, with semantic masks and multiple camera views.0:57
RoboPRO comparison. Selected rollouts from the π0.5 baseline and MOSAIC.0:40
Semantic mask-token attention. How the action expert attends to target, destination, and obstacle tokens.0:56
Explore the attention visualizations 2 videos
Across all action-expert layers. Action-to-image attention in π0.5 and MOSAIC, with selected regions highlighted.0:30
A closer look at early attention. Side-by-side attention maps from the first three action-expert layers.0:30

Evaluation highlights

Stronger performance in clutter.

Built on π0.5 and evaluated across four RoboPRO environments, with qualitative real-world manipulation experiments. Visual robustness tests vary lighting, blur, and pixel shifts.

+5.1pp

Cluttered scenes

Success rate: 52.7% → 57.8%

+9.7pp

Visual perturbations

Success rate: 65.2% → 74.9%

Largest gain+25.0pp

Office · visual perturbations

Success rate: 51.7% → 76.7%

pp = percentage points, compared with the RoboPRO-finetuned π0.5 baseline (Tables I–II). In cluttered scenes, collision-free success improves from 39.7% to 41.3%, while collision rate increases from 39.7% to 44.8%.